- 相關(guān)推薦
2017英語專八閱讀練習(xí)題及答案分析
引導(dǎo)語：想要提高英語閱讀水平，要靠平時的多寫多練，以下是百分網(wǎng)小編為大家整理的英語專八閱讀練習(xí)題及答案分析，歡迎閱讀!
Passage one
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence “suggests a casual link” between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields—those having very longwave-lengths—and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer, While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans.”
The report is no reason to panic—or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the Whit House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, tit generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects, For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field, The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such “ionizing” radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is for from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire document” toward proving a link. “Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer,” the Air Force concludes. “It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report.” Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
1. The main idea of this passage is ___________
[A]. studies on the cause of cancer
[B]. controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
[C]. the relationship between electricity and cancer.
[D]. different ideas about the effect of electricity on caner.
2. The view-point of the EPA is ___________
[A]. there is casual link between electricity and cancer.
[B]. electricity really affects cancer.
[C]. controversial.
[D].low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
3. Why did the Pentagon and Whit House object to the release of the report? Because ___________
[A]. it may stir a great deal of debate among the Bush Administration.
[B]. every unit of the modern military has depended on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment.
[C]. the Pentagon’s concern was understandable.
[D]. they had different arguments.
4. It can be inferred from physical phenomenon ___________
[A]. the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful.
[B]. the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate.
[C]. electromagnetic field may affect health.
[D]. only more powerful radiation can knock electron out of human body.
5. What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?
[A].They are indifferent. [B]. They are worried very much.
[C]. The may exercise prudent avoidance. [C]. They are shocked.
Vocabulary
1. preposterous 反常的，十分荒謬的，乖戾的
2. leukemia 白血病
3. malignancy 惡性腫瘤
4. legitimate 合法的，合理的
5. paranoia 偏執(zhí)狂，妄想狂。這里指：無根據(jù)的擔(dān)心。
6. lymphoma 淋巴瘤
7. carcinogen 致癌物
8. minuscule 很小的，很不重要
9. consensus 輿論
10. wallop 亂竄，猛沖，沖擊力
11. epidemiological 流行病學(xué)的
12. blistering 羅嗦的，胡扯的
13. critique 評論，批評
14. imprimatur 出版許可(官方審查后的)，批準
難句譯注
1. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate—or the worst kind of paranoia.
[參考譯文] 由于這問題的證據(jù)還不是結(jié)論性的，而且常常是矛盾的，所以就難以斷定有關(guān)電力對身體的影響的顧慮是合乎情理，還是毫無根據(jù)的懷疑。
2. EPA——U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 美國環(huán)境保護署
3. While the report falls short (缺乏，不夠) of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as “a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans.”
[參考譯文] 雖然報告沒有把極低頻磁場歸類為可能致癌物，但它確實指出通常60赫茲的磁場是“一種雖尚未證實，但可能導(dǎo)致人患癌癥的因素。”
4. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the Whit House
[參考譯文] 證據(jù)爭議性仍然很大，所以報告草案在布什政府內(nèi)引起巨大的爭辯，而環(huán)保署無視無角大樓和白宮的強烈反對，公布了這份報告。
5. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
[參考譯文] 這遠比細胞所產(chǎn)生的電磁場低的多。
6. …and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body.
[參考譯文] 而且?guī)资陙�，科學(xué)家專注于更為強大的輻射類別，如X光射線，其聚合的沖擊力足以把電子從組成人體的分子中撞出來。
7. But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect.
[參考譯文] 可是流行病學(xué)的研究發(fā)現(xiàn)，幾組資料在數(shù)據(jù)方面有所關(guān)聯(lián)，卻沒有證實其因果關(guān)系。
8. a body of laboratory work 一批研究成果。
9. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having “biased the entire document” toward proving a link.
[參考譯文] 在長達33頁的對環(huán)保署文件的十分尖銳的批評中，空軍方面的科學(xué)家指責(zé)，作者歪曲整個文件以證明癌癥和電磁場之間的關(guān)聯(lián)。
10. It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report.
[參考譯文] 令人驚訝的是環(huán)保署竟然批準許可這份報告的出籠。
寫作方法與文章大意
文章以問答的方式，對比的寫作方法，寫出了圍繞電力是否影響健康——是否致癌因素的兩種觀點，及其觀點的依據(jù)。一種是美國環(huán)境保護署為代表的：極低頻磁場是一種可能但還未被證實的致癌因素，而且無視白宮和五角大樓反對，公布了這份報告。理由是科學(xué)證據(jù)提出了兩者之間的關(guān)聯(lián)偶然性。另一種以空軍中科學(xué)家為主的觀點：電磁場不會誘發(fā)或觸發(fā)癌癥，而且以歪曲整個文件來證明兩者之關(guān)系，批評了環(huán)保署。其理由人人皆知。因軍隊中任一單位都有點——從地面雷達到艦艇飛機防衛(wèi)系統(tǒng)。
答案祥解
1. D 電力對癌癥影響的不同觀點。文章一開始就提出了“電會致癌嗎?”這個問題。十多年來，一大批科學(xué)家和新聞界人士都指出：研究結(jié)果似乎表示：接觸電磁場可能會增加患白血病和其他惡性腫瘤的危險性。所以說到目前為止還難以確定電力對健康的影響究竟是理性的，還是杞人憂天。見難句注釋1。第二段公布了環(huán)保署的報告，見難句注釋3。第三段說明：即使有致癌危險也是極微的。但應(yīng)予以認真對待，進行更多的研究。而第七段中空軍方面的科學(xué)家還沒有被說服(見難句注釋9)，明確提出，我們的評論員認為沒有跡象說明環(huán)境中存在的電力會誘發(fā)或促發(fā)癌癥。
A. 對致癌因素的研究。 B. 致癌原因方面有爭議的觀點，這兩項根本部隊，和文內(nèi)電力毫無關(guān)系。 C. 電力和癌癥的關(guān)系，文中涉及的是電力究竟會不會致癌的兩種觀點，而不是兩者之關(guān)系。
2. A. 電和致癌有一定難以確定的關(guān)系。答案在第二段第三句，環(huán)保署目前的結(jié)論是據(jù)科學(xué)證據(jù)指出極低頻電磁場——具有長波的電磁場——和白血病，淋巴瘤及腦癌之間有著難以確定的聯(lián)系，見難句注釋3。
A. 電確實致癌，不對。 C. 有爭議的。說的不夠清楚，爭議什么。 D. 低頻磁場是一個可能致癌因素。這只是論點的一面。
3. B. 現(xiàn)代軍事的任何部門都一直依賴于應(yīng)用大量應(yīng)用電子設(shè)備。五角大樓和白宮所以反對環(huán)保署公布報告之理由就在此�？哲姺矫娴膶＜宜哉f環(huán)保署方面的報告“歪曲了整個文件以證明兩者之間的關(guān)系”也在此。見難句注釋4。所以文內(nèi)說“角大樓的關(guān)注是可以理解的。”
A. 報告會在布什政府內(nèi)引起大規(guī)模的辯論，這是結(jié)果。 C. 五角大樓的關(guān)注是可以理解的，這不是原因。 D. 他們有不同的觀點。
4. 磁場力太弱不會產(chǎn)生有害作用。答案在第四段第二，三句，當(dāng)電流通過電纜，產(chǎn)生磁場，對周圍物體產(chǎn)生(影響)力。許多年來，科學(xué)家把任何有關(guān)“這些力可能有害的想法”置于一邊(不予考慮)，主要是因為它們(所產(chǎn)生的力)非常弱。
B. 磁場力比細胞產(chǎn)生的電磁場弱。只是明確指出的事實。 C. 磁場力對人的健康有害。不對。 D. 只有更強的輻射才能把人體中的電子擊出來。不對。
5. C. 他們會采取謹慎小心避開電器的途徑。因為他們不可能象A項那樣漠不關(guān)心。這種問題直接影響人的生命。
B. 他們非常擔(dān)憂。 D. 他們感到震驚，這兩項都不可能，因為還在爭議中，唯一的途徑是盡量避開和電器接觸。
passage Two
Pageants are usually conceived on a fairly large scale, often under the auspices of some local or civic authority or at any rate in connection with local groups of some kind.This sometimes means that there is an allocation of funds available for the purpose of mounting the production, though unfortunately this will usually be found to be on the meager side and much ingenuity will have to be used to stretch it so that all performers can be adequately clothed.
Most pageants have a historical flavour as they usually come about through the celebration of the anniversary of some event of historic importance, or the life or death of some local worthy.Research among archives and books in the public library will probably prove very useful and produce some workable ideas which will give the production an especially local flavour.From the first economy will have to be practiced because there are usually a great number of people to dress.Leading characters can be considered individually in the same way as when designing for a play; but the main body of the performers will need to be planned in groups and the massed effect must be always borne in mind.
Many pageants take place in daylight in the open air.This is an entirely different problem from designing costumes which are going to be looked at under artificial lighting; for one thing, scenes viewed in the daylight are subject to many more distractions.No longer is everything around cut out by the surrounding darkness, but instead it is very easy to be aware of disturbing movement in the audience of behind the performers.Very theatrically conceived clothes do not always look their best when seen in a daylight setting of trees, verdant lawns and old ivy-covered walls; the same goes for costumes being worn in front of the mellow colors of stately homes.The location needs to be studied and then a decision can be made as to what kinds of colors and textures will harmonize best with the surroundings and conditions and then to carry this out as far as possible on the funds available.
If money is available to dress the performers without recourse to their own help in the provision of items, it is best to arrange for all the cutting and pinning together of the costumes to be done by one or two experienced people than to be given out to the groups and individuals for completion.When there is little or no money at all, the garments need to be reduced to the basic necessities.Cloaks and shawls become invaluable, sheets and large bath towels and bath sheets are admirable for draping.Unwanted curtains and bed spreads can be cut to make tunics, robes and skirts.These are particularly valuable if they are of heavy fabrics such as velvet or chenille.
Colors should be massed together so that there are contrasting groups of dark and light, this will be found to help the visual result substantially.Crowds of people gathered together in a jumble of colors will be ground to look quite purposeless and will lack dramatic impact.
The use of numbers of identical head-dresses, however simply made, are always effective when working with groups.If these are made of cardboard and painted boldly the cost can be almost negligible.Helmets, hats and plumes will all make quite a show even if the costumes are only blandest or sheets cleverly draped.The same can be said of the use of banners, shields and poles with stiff pennants and garlands—anything which will help to have a unifying effect.Any kind of eye-catching device will always go with a flourish and add excitement to the scenes.
1.The main idea of this passage is ___________
[A]Pageants.
[B]Costumes on the stage.
[C]Costumes for pageants.
[D] How to arrange a pageant.
2.It can be inferred that the most important factor in costume design is ___________
[A]money.
[B]color.
[C]harmony
[D]texture
3.Why will much ingenuity have to be required in costume design?
[A]Because pageants take place in daylight in the open air.
[B]Because different characters require different costumes.
[C]Because the colors and textures must be in harmony with the setting.
[D]Because an allocation of the funds available is usually rather small.
4.Why do most pageants have a historical flavour?
[A]Because most pageants take place for celebration.
[B]Many pageants take place for amusement.
[C]A lot of pageants take place for religion.
[D]Because pageants usually take place for competition.
Vocabulary
1. conceive 設(shè)想，想象 to be conceived 設(shè)想好的，構(gòu)思好的
2. under the auspices of 在……的主辦下
3. meager 貧乏的，不足的
4. mount 登上，制作，上演
5. flavour 風(fēng)味，風(fēng)格，情趣
6. archive(s) 檔案(館)
7. distraction 使人分心的事
8. ivy 常春藤
9. mellow 柔和的
10. recourse (to) 依賴，求助于
11. drape 覆蓋，披上
12. invaluable 無價的，非常貴重的
13. tunic (古時)長達膝蓋的外衣，穿在盔甲上的戰(zhàn)袍
14. chenille 繩絨絨(織品)
15. jumble 混亂，搞亂
16. pennant 細長三角旗
17. garland 花環(huán)，花冠
【英語專八閱讀練習(xí)題及答案分析】相關(guān)文章：
2017英語專八閱讀理解練習(xí)題06-29
專八英語考試閱讀理解練習(xí)題05-29
17年英語專八考試閱讀題及答案05-10
英語專四考試閱讀練習(xí)題11-01
專八英語考試閱讀理解試題附答案10-17
專四英語閱讀理解練習(xí)及答案10-12