亚洲另类精品国产一级欧美,欧美精品偷拍一直L

相關推薦

2016年5月雅思寫作考試大作文

　　2016年5月有四場雅思考試，有兩場寫作就談到了關于孩子的教育問題，下面是小編整理的范文，歡迎閱讀!

2016年5月雅思寫作考試大作文

　　2016年5月7日雅思寫作考試大作文

　　Some people think teaching children different abilities together benefits everyone, but others think intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

　　有人認為集中給孩子們教授不同的技能可以使所有的'人收益，但有人認為聰明的孩子應該單獨培養(yǎng)特殊對待。討論以上2種觀點并給出你的看法。

　　參考范文：

　　An undeniable(不可否認的) fact in our life is that some children are more intelligent(聰明的) or capable(有才能的)than their peers. However,whether these children should be taught separately has long been a topic of debate.

　　If students with different abilities are put in the same class the first benefit is that they can learn from each other and draw on (吸取) other people's strengths. A mathematical(數學的) genius(天才) may be poor in arts or sports and this is what he can improve by interacting(互動) with his classmates. Also why we object to separate teaching is that teachers tend to pay more attention to those with better academic results which may give students in the slow class a sense of discrimination(歧視).

　　However,some people believe that children should be put in different classes according to their abilities. This mode enables students particularly(尤其) those intelligent ones to fully develop their potentials(潛力).In their own class: they can be given special training without worrying that their classmates cannot keep up with the class. This also seems to be a reasonable arrangement for those ordinary students who would feel less stressed . With students of similar abilities in one class it would be easier for schools to make their teaching plans and control the progress.

　　From my point of view,to promote an all-around(全方位) development it is better to have students study together regardless of their abilities and talents. However this is not against individualized teaching and learning in our schools. In addition to standardized teaching plans some extra-curricular programs can be designed for students with particular talents in some aspects

　　5月19日雅思考試寫作大作文范文

　　In many countries women are able to join the armed forces. However, some people think only men should be members of the army, navy and air force. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　很多國家，女人能夠加入武裝部隊。然而，一些人認為只有男人應該成為陸軍，海軍和空軍的一員，多大程度上你同意或不同意?

　　參考范文：

　　The opinion that women should join the army or be police as equally as men is popularly held amongst some egalitarians recently. They tend to believe women are capable of handling these masculine jobs as men do.

　　In some extent, of course they are right. All along we clamored for equality. Since we have achieved a marvelous progress, for example, women now have the right to vote as men do. Then why can’t we put forward the success to the military level? After all, as another part of our nation, it’s thus reasonably for women to shoulder the responsibility of protecting our country and guard the security of our society.

　　Nevertheless, it’s necessary to remember that the equality between men and women means the society should not discriminate women in terms of citizenship rights, working capability, family roles and so on, and by becoming a police or soldier isn’t the rational way to demonstrate equality.

　　The truth is that there are differences in men and women, thus leading to their different choices toward career. Jobs like teacher, nurse, advisers are featured as more feminine thus can generally be done better by women; while soldiers, police are more suitable for men. In fact, without any external forces, men are more likely to choose to be the breadwinner of families over to staying at home looking after children whereas women appear to act the exact opposite way.

　　Another relevant point to remember is manual work is not designed for women. Even if the government compulsorily get equal number of women on army list to men. This would only end up bringing down the overall strength of the army.

　　In conclusion, we should remember that equality is compatible with difference. Only when we take the right attitude toward equality can it plays the most significant role in our society.

　　5月21日雅思考試寫作大作文范文

　　Some people argue that countries should have a moral obligation to help each other; on the other hand, some people argue that a large amount of aid money does not reach the poor of the world. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

　　有人認為國家之間應該有相互幫助的道義責任。另一方面，有人認為大筆的艾滋病款項沒有到達世界上的'貧困地區(qū)。討論這兩種觀點并給出自己的觀點。

　　參考范文：

　　In this age of globalization, nations are closely bonded than ever before. So it is quite common for rich countries to give international aid to the more impoverished ones. Generally, I think that it is the right thing to do and that the aid can take different forms besides capital.

　　People who are concerned the fact that financial support might not go to the poor would argue that the poorest nations are typically badly governed, where corruption, official incompetence, and failure to protect basic property rights are capable of rendering the aid money not just useless but harmful.This could be a problem. However, the point here is not that we should be skeptical of the concept of international aid itself but that the way we implement it need be ca refully designed, and different types pf foreign assistance should be adopted accordingly.

　　The necessity and the significance of this practice are easily noted. With foreign investment, there tends to be mo chances of employment in less developed places, which means more income for local people and greater social stability for local communities. More direct benefits can also be noticed in the fields of medical care and education. As a result of medical donations and some dedicated medical teams in particular, several prevalent diseases have been controlled or eradicated in many poor nations. With the support of educational resources from developed countries, more schools have been set up in those less developed areas, so people there have more accesses to education, which actually helps to promote the development of those places in the long turn .

　　Overall, I am supportive of the idea that richer countries have a moral responsibility to help poor ones,and the influence of this endeavor is far-reaching and it should therefore be encouraged.

　　5月28日雅思考試寫作大作文

　　New parents should attend parenting courses to learn how to bring up their children well. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

　　新晉父母應該參加育兒課程，學習如何撫養(yǎng)孩子。你在多大程度上同意或不同意?

　　參考范文：

　　A parenting course is one designed to help parents understand how to bring up their children in a better way. While many people think such a course is extremely useful, I think it is of very little use, if not at all, to parents who wish to give their children a better future.

　　In the first place, attending a parenting course is valuable to parents only in theory, but not in practice. Such a course usually tells the parents why they should do this and avoid doing that. For instance, parents are often told to let their children voice their opinions publicly, or encourage their children to follow certain rules and regulations. But as we know, bringing up a child is never so easy as remembering some set principles. It is a far more tricky and delicate undertaking. As each child is a unique case, the parents actually have nobody, not to mention any universal rule, to depend on but their own judgements and understanding. Pushing a child shy in nature to speak themselves out in public is no good, and making a child with a highly original mind follow others is like dampening their talents.

　　Additionally, taking a parenting course is sometimes costly in time and money. Normally, parents have to spend more than 100 hours on such a course, but this time could just as well be spent taking the child to the park or working together with the child towards the solution to a certain interesting problem. The more time parents spend with their children, the better upbringing the children may have. If the parents have to pay much money for a parenting course, then their children are sacrificed one more time: the books their parents buy for them with the money may never be bought now because their parents have spent the money on some stupid parenting course.

　　In my view, the parents take a parenting course due to laziness or a lack of confidence. They do not want to go into the life of their children but want to be told some "truths" about bringing up children; they do not believe in themselves but rather in books and what others tell them. A parenting course is thus not beneficial, but detrimental to parents when upbringing their children.

【5月雅思寫作考試大作文】相關文章：

雅思寫作標準05-17