- 相關(guān)推薦
公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets-5閱讀理解模擬試題
人的大腦和肢體一樣，多用則靈，不用則廢。以下是小編為大家搜索整理的公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets-5閱讀理解模擬試題，希望能給大家?guī)?lái)幫助!
President Clinton’s decision on Apr.8 to send Chinese Premier Zhu Rongji packing without an agreement on China’s entry into the World Trade Organization seemed to be a massive miscalculation. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag. The Cabinet and Whit House still appeared divided, and business leaders were characterized as furious over the lost opportunity. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked “the courage” to reach an accord. And when Clinton later telephoned the angry Zhu to pledge a renewed effort at negotiations, the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop.
In fact, Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal. A lot more horse trading is needed before a final agreement can be reached. And without the Administration’s goal of a “bullet-proof agreement” that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.
THE HARD PART. Many business lobbyists, while disappointed that the deal was not closed, agree that better terms can still be had. And Treasury Secretary Robert E. Rubin, National Economic Council Director Gene B. Sperling, Commerce Secretary William M. Daley, and top trade negotiator Charlene Barshefsky all advised Clinton that while the Chinese had made a remarkable number of concessions, “we’re not there yet,” according to senior officials.
Negotiating with Zhu over the remaining issues may be the easy part. Although Clinton can signal U.S. approval for China’s entry into the WTO himself, he needs Congress to grant Beijing permanent most-favored-nation status as part of a broad trade accord. And the temptation for meddling on Capital Hill may prove over-whelming. Zhu had barely landed before Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott (R-Miss) declared himself skeptical that China deserved entry into the WTO. And Senators Jesse A. Helms (R-N.C.) and Emest F. Hollings (D-S. C.) promised to introduce a bill requiring congressional approval of any deal.
The hidden message from these three textile-state Southerners: Get more protection for the U. S. clothing industry. Hoping to smooth the way, the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit. Zhu refused to open up much of the lucrative Chinese securities market and insisted on “cultural” restrictions on American movies and music. He also blocked efforts to allow U. S. auto makers to provide fleet financing.
BIG JOB. Already, business lobbyists are blanketing Capitol Hill to presale any eventual agreement, but what they’ve heard so far isn’t encouraging. Republicans, including Lott, say that “the time just isn’t right” for the deal. Translation: We’re determined to make it look as if Clinton has capitulated to the Chinese and is ignoring human, religious, and labor rights violations; the theft of nuclear-weapons technology; and the sale of missile parts to America’s enemies. Beijing’s fierce critics within the Democratic Party, such as Senator Paul D. Wellstone of Minnesota and House Minority leader Richard A. Gephardt of Missouri, won’t help, either.
Just how tough the lobbying job on Capitol Hill will be become clear on Apr. 20, when Rubin lectured 19chief executives on the need to discipline their Republican allies. With business and the White House still trading charges over who is responsible for the defeat of fast-track trade negotiating legislation in 1997, working together won’t be easy. And Republicans-with a wink-say that they’ll eventually embrace China’s entry into the WTO as a favor to Corporate America. Though not long before they torture Clinton. But Zhu is out on a limb, and if Congress overdoes the criticism, he may be forced by domestic critics to renege. Business must make this much dear to both its GOP allies and the Whit House: This historic deal is too important to risk losing to any more partisan squabbling
1. The main idea of this passage is
[A]. The Contradiction between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party.
[B]. On China’s entry into WTO.
[C]. Clinton was right.
[D]. Business Lobbyists Control Capitol Hill.
2. What does the sentence “Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, Detroit” convey?
[A]. Premier Zhu rejected their requirements.
[B]. The three places overdid criticism.
[C]. They wanted more protection.
[D]. They are in trouble.
3. What was the attitude of the Republican Party toward China’s entry into the WTO?
[A]. Contradictory. [B].Appreciative.
[C]. Disapproving. [D]. Detestful.
4. Who plays the leading part in the deal in America?
[A]. White House . [B]. Republicans.
[C]. The Democratic Party. [D]. Businessmen.
5. It can be inferred from the passage that
[A]. America will make concessions.
[B]. America will hold out for a better WTO
[C]. Clinton has the right to signal U. S. approval for China’s entry.
[D]. Democratic party approve China’s entry into the WTO.
Vocabulary
1. drubbing 痛打
get/take a drabbing 遭人痛打
2. flip-flop=great change suddenly 游說(shuō)，3. 突然改變，4. 突然反方向。人字拖鞋，5. 趾拖鞋
6. hold out 維持，7. 保持
hold out for sth. 故意拖延達(dá)成協(xié)議以謀求……
8. horse -trading 精明的討價(jià)還價(jià)
9. bullet-proof 防彈的
10. lobby 收買(mǎi)，11. 暗中活動(dòng)
12. lobbyist 院外活動(dòng)集團(tuán)成員
13. partisan 黨人，14. 幫派，15. 是黨派強(qiáng)硬支持者
16. acrimony 語(yǔ)言/態(tài)度的刻薄
19. meddle 干預(yù)
20. Capitol Hill 美國(guó)國(guó)會(huì)
21. budge 使稍22. 微移動(dòng)，23. 改變
24. lucrative 有利可圖的，25. 賺錢(qián)的
26. block 制止
27. fleet 艦隊(duì)，28. 船隊(duì)，29. 車(chē)隊(duì)，30. 機(jī)隊(duì)
31. blanket 覆蓋，32. 妨礙掃興，33. 撲滅
34. Capitulate 投降，35. 停止抵抗
36. fast track 快速行程(輕車(chē)熟路)
37. with a wink 眼睛一眨，38. 很快的
39. out on a limb 孤立無(wú)援(尤指40. 爭(zhēng)論和意見(jiàn)上)
41. renege 違約
42. squabble 爭(zhēng)吵
難句譯注
1. The President took a drubbing from much of the press, which had breathlessly reported that a deal was in the bag.
[結(jié)構(gòu)簡(jiǎn)析] in the bag 倒手，囊中之物。
[參考譯文] 總統(tǒng)遭到許多報(bào)界輿論的抨擊，它們?cè)鴪?bào)道過(guò)這樁買(mǎi)賣(mài)(入世貿(mào))已是囊中之物。
2. Zhu charged that Clinton lacked “the courage” to reach an accord.
[參考譯文] 朱指責(zé)克林頓缺乏達(dá)成協(xié)議的勇氣。
3. the gesture was widely portrayed as a flip-flop
[參考譯文] 普遍認(rèn)為總統(tǒng)的姿態(tài)來(lái)了一個(gè)一百八十度的轉(zhuǎn)彎。
4. Clinton made the right decision in holding out for a better WTO deal.
[參考譯文] 總統(tǒng)故意拖延協(xié)議以謀取一筆更好的入世貿(mào)組織交易的決定完全正確。
5. And without the Administration’s goal of a “bullet-proof agreement” that business lobbyists can enthusiastically sell to a Republican Congress, the whole process will end up in partisan acrimony that could harm relations with China for years.
[參考譯文] 沒(méi)有商界院外活動(dòng)集團(tuán)成員熱情的勸說(shuō)共和黨國(guó)會(huì)采納政府目標(biāo)中的防彈性(保護(hù)性)協(xié)議，那么整個(gè)過(guò)程將會(huì)以黨派之間的尖刻的爭(zhēng)吵而結(jié)束，這會(huì)影響以后多年和中國(guó)的關(guān)系。
6. the Administration tried, but failed, to budge Zhu on textiles.
[參考譯文] 美國(guó)政府希望(為紡織業(yè))鋪平道路，試圖使朱在紡織品上讓步，結(jié)果失敗。
7. Also left in the lurch: Wall Street, Hollywood, and Detroit.
[結(jié)構(gòu)簡(jiǎn)析] 這句句子連接上文而說(shuō)。
Leave sb. In the lurch 固定用法，義：置某人于困難之中棄之不顧，遺棄某人。完整句型應(yīng)該是：Wall Street, Hollywood and Detrait are also left in the lurch.
[參考譯文] 同樣也陷于困境的有華爾街，好萊塢和底特律。
8. Translation. 翻譯。這是作者為共和黨的“The time isn’t right”做注解/解釋。
寫(xiě)作方法與文章大意
文章以先聲奪人的寫(xiě)作手法：克林頓不同意中國(guó)加入世貿(mào)打發(fā)朱總理回國(guó)引出兩黨(共和黨和民主黨)矛盾，國(guó)會(huì)和白宮之相反意見(jiàn)(對(duì)比寫(xiě)法)到最終四方趨向一致來(lái)證明總統(tǒng)決定是對(duì)的--以最好的價(jià)碼使美國(guó)獲得最佳利益為前提同意中國(guó)加入世貿(mào)來(lái)滿足美國(guó)商人的要求。
【公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets-5閱讀理解模擬試題】相關(guān)文章：
英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets-5模擬試題201708-02
英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets一級(jí)閱讀理解模擬試題08-15
2017年英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets-5級(jí)考前模擬精選試題08-28
公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試pets4級(jí)閱讀模擬試題07-17
2017年英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試公共英語(yǔ)五級(jí)試題閱讀理解05-28
2017年公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試二級(jí)閱讀理解復(fù)習(xí)試題06-19
2017年公共英語(yǔ)等級(jí)考試二級(jí)試題短文理解模擬練習(xí)05-18